[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831884, encodeId=2d9483188494, content=审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：第二次投bt 第一次5天被拒
1.22 submission
1.25 with editor
1.26 under review
2.16 under editor evaluation
2.19 major revise
两个审稿人第一个就是补实验
第二个比较苛刻提了两个尖锐的问题
主编给了1个月时间3.19
由于补实验并反复修改申延10天至3.29
3.28发着高烧坚持把修改稿返回revision submitted to journal
3.29 editor 两个小问题
3.30返修revision submitted to journal
3.31with editor 下午 accept
法国编辑nice , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e17a5413995, createdName=ms4097232105300978, createdTime=Fri Apr 01 16:11:56 CST 2016, time=2016-04-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=518185, encodeId=d58351818592, content=Submitted to Journal 11.21
With Editor 11.23
Under Review 12.03
Major Revise 12.30
Revision Submitted to Journal 01.06
With Editor 01.07
Accept 01.08, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=664, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=6f3187958, createdName=wangzch10, createdTime=Sat Jan 09 07:51:00 CST 2016, time=2016-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515637, encodeId=528751563edf, content=期刊还不错（除了自引率高一点），编辑也不错（效率很高），就是找的一些审稿人很让人无语，我的文章两个审稿人，第一个给的意见我都能接受（即使人家建议拒稿）。另一个明显是中国人审的，字里行间带着满满的讽刺和恶意，明明我写了真菌鉴定用的ITS序列分析，他非说我写的是用的16S 序列分析，回复的几条意见从没有理由，都是直接批，还用标点（叹号加问号）以示讽刺。非常不尊重我的工作。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=703, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=0a141649393, createdName=考拉苏, createdTime=Tue Sep 29 19:39:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515614, encodeId=d6f251561465, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：8.12 Submitted to Journal
8.13 With Editor
8.14 Under Review
8.22 Under Review
9.10 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Major Revise
9.27 Revision Submitted to Journal
9.28 With Editor
9.28 Accept
这是一篇关乎我博士毕业的论文，非常感谢法国编辑的效率。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=606, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=51a71653047, createdName=yulianjingsi, createdTime=Mon Sep 28 16:42:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513132, encodeId=0d2f51313239, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：红球藻代谢 5天被拒 不属于生物质能源，建议改投专门研究微藻类杂志
I regret to inform you that your submission is outside the scope of the journal because results reported would be more suited to a journal specialized in algology. Therefore I would suggest that you resubmit this paper to another journal., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=682, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=ea71103699, createdName=yiluxiaopao, createdTime=Wed Jul 01 14:33:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=512867, encodeId=64c151286ec8, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：个人感觉该杂志是比较看重新意的，并且如果paper是偏向于成果转化的话，中的可能性更大，其实感觉它对机理及深度要求不大。之前投了一篇research文章，内容数据量不是很大，但有一定的新意，所以杂志给了个short communication。审稿很快，从投出去到接受前后不到一个月时间，编辑提出的意见很中肯很专业，基本上按照他们的建议进行修改就没啥问题。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=655, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=345a1604776, createdName=zhangran22105, createdTime=Tue Jun 23 05:41:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=511593, encodeId=55835115931f, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：感谢medsci，我大部分关于sci的认识都源于此，虽然我的论文已被拒稿。以下是我的经历，供大家参考。我人论文为固定化酶用于废水处理。由于就常规材料，处理效果也一般，这个酶差不多是比较新的酶。好吧，总共只有一个审稿人的信息，各种批：材料没新意，效果让人无印象，固定方法是2传统的，操作过程不严谨，稿件主题不符合本杂志。建议投催化类的杂志，重复实验，重写文章。以下是我的经历：
3.24 submited to journal
3.26 with editor
4.02 under review
4.22 process in decission (半夜）
4.26 reject（凌晨2点）
以上纯手打，英语比较差，可能有错误！我投稿的编号是1600多，大家可以参考拒稿率。
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=1007, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=60151622867, createdName=Kaiduan1990, createdTime=Fri May 01 18:09:00 CST 2015, time=2015-05-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=508326, encodeId=c38b50832626, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：最近我刚中了一篇bt，可实验室投了好多篇接连杯具，感觉文章注重新意，另外要符合研究范围且系统。还是很容易的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=701, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=Qqs, createdTime=Wed Dec 10 16:21:00 CST 2014, time=2014-12-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507120, encodeId=8a7b50e1206c, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：拒稿率逐年升高，而且有消息称国外的期刊在遇到中国投稿的时候会限制接受率，有的甚至没审就因为名额限制而被拒掉了。一般一周左右编辑会决定直接拒稿还是送审，送审后审稿周期大于1.5~2个月，总的来说审稿速度算快了。审稿意见还是比较中肯的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=797, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=3d1494700, createdName=zhouqi269, createdTime=Tue Oct 28 09:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=505690, encodeId=d94450569089, content=我觉得这个期刊还是不错，里面有些文章质量也还是不错的，每个期刊关注的不一样，CNS里也有不好的论文存在，nature不也有作假文章吗？
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=718, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=80c7108919, createdName=lf6220, createdTime=Sat Aug 30 12:27:00 CST 2014, time=2014-08-30, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
2016-04-01
ms4097232105300978
审稿速度:1.0经验分享：第二次投bt 第一次5天被拒
1.22 submission
1.25 with editor
1.26 under review
2.16 under editor evaluation
2.19 major revise
两个审稿人第一个就是补实验
第二个比较苛刻提了两个尖锐的问题
主编给了1个月时间3.19
由于补实验并反复修改申延10天至3.29
3.28发着高烧坚持把修改稿返回revision submitted to journal
3.29 editor 两个小问题
3.30返修revision submitted to journal
3.31with editor 下午 accept
法国编辑nice
34
0
举报
[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831884, encodeId=2d9483188494, content=审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：第二次投bt 第一次5天被拒
1.22 submission
1.25 with editor
1.26 under review
2.16 under editor evaluation
2.19 major revise
两个审稿人第一个就是补实验
第二个比较苛刻提了两个尖锐的问题
主编给了1个月时间3.19
由于补实验并反复修改申延10天至3.29
3.28发着高烧坚持把修改稿返回revision submitted to journal
3.29 editor 两个小问题
3.30返修revision submitted to journal
3.31with editor 下午 accept
法国编辑nice , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e17a5413995, createdName=ms4097232105300978, createdTime=Fri Apr 01 16:11:56 CST 2016, time=2016-04-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=518185, encodeId=d58351818592, content=Submitted to Journal 11.21
With Editor 11.23
Under Review 12.03
Major Revise 12.30
Revision Submitted to Journal 01.06
With Editor 01.07
Accept 01.08, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=664, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=6f3187958, createdName=wangzch10, createdTime=Sat Jan 09 07:51:00 CST 2016, time=2016-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515637, encodeId=528751563edf, content=期刊还不错（除了自引率高一点），编辑也不错（效率很高），就是找的一些审稿人很让人无语，我的文章两个审稿人，第一个给的意见我都能接受（即使人家建议拒稿）。另一个明显是中国人审的，字里行间带着满满的讽刺和恶意，明明我写了真菌鉴定用的ITS序列分析，他非说我写的是用的16S 序列分析，回复的几条意见从没有理由，都是直接批，还用标点（叹号加问号）以示讽刺。非常不尊重我的工作。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=703, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=0a141649393, createdName=考拉苏, createdTime=Tue Sep 29 19:39:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515614, encodeId=d6f251561465, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：8.12 Submitted to Journal
8.13 With Editor
8.14 Under Review
8.22 Under Review
9.10 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Major Revise
9.27 Revision Submitted to Journal
9.28 With Editor
9.28 Accept
这是一篇关乎我博士毕业的论文，非常感谢法国编辑的效率。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=606, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=51a71653047, createdName=yulianjingsi, createdTime=Mon Sep 28 16:42:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513132, encodeId=0d2f51313239, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：红球藻代谢 5天被拒 不属于生物质能源，建议改投专门研究微藻类杂志
I regret to inform you that your submission is outside the scope of the journal because results reported would be more suited to a journal specialized in algology. Therefore I would suggest that you resubmit this paper to another journal., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=682, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=ea71103699, createdName=yiluxiaopao, createdTime=Wed Jul 01 14:33:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=512867, encodeId=64c151286ec8, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：个人感觉该杂志是比较看重新意的，并且如果paper是偏向于成果转化的话，中的可能性更大，其实感觉它对机理及深度要求不大。之前投了一篇research文章，内容数据量不是很大，但有一定的新意，所以杂志给了个short communication。审稿很快，从投出去到接受前后不到一个月时间，编辑提出的意见很中肯很专业，基本上按照他们的建议进行修改就没啥问题。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=655, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=345a1604776, createdName=zhangran22105, createdTime=Tue Jun 23 05:41:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=511593, encodeId=55835115931f, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：感谢medsci，我大部分关于sci的认识都源于此，虽然我的论文已被拒稿。以下是我的经历，供大家参考。我人论文为固定化酶用于废水处理。由于就常规材料，处理效果也一般，这个酶差不多是比较新的酶。好吧，总共只有一个审稿人的信息，各种批：材料没新意，效果让人无印象，固定方法是2传统的，操作过程不严谨，稿件主题不符合本杂志。建议投催化类的杂志，重复实验，重写文章。以下是我的经历：
3.24 submited to journal
3.26 with editor
4.02 under review
4.22 process in decission (半夜）
4.26 reject（凌晨2点）
以上纯手打，英语比较差，可能有错误！我投稿的编号是1600多，大家可以参考拒稿率。
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=1007, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=60151622867, createdName=Kaiduan1990, createdTime=Fri May 01 18:09:00 CST 2015, time=2015-05-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=508326, encodeId=c38b50832626, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：最近我刚中了一篇bt，可实验室投了好多篇接连杯具，感觉文章注重新意，另外要符合研究范围且系统。还是很容易的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=701, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=Qqs, createdTime=Wed Dec 10 16:21:00 CST 2014, time=2014-12-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507120, encodeId=8a7b50e1206c, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：拒稿率逐年升高，而且有消息称国外的期刊在遇到中国投稿的时候会限制接受率，有的甚至没审就因为名额限制而被拒掉了。一般一周左右编辑会决定直接拒稿还是送审，送审后审稿周期大于1.5~2个月，总的来说审稿速度算快了。审稿意见还是比较中肯的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=797, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=3d1494700, createdName=zhouqi269, createdTime=Tue Oct 28 09:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=505690, encodeId=d94450569089, content=我觉得这个期刊还是不错，里面有些文章质量也还是不错的，每个期刊关注的不一样，CNS里也有不好的论文存在，nature不也有作假文章吗？
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=718, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=80c7108919, createdName=lf6220, createdTime=Sat Aug 30 12:27:00 CST 2014, time=2014-08-30, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
2016-01-09
wangzch10
Submitted to Journal 11.21 With Editor 11.23 Under Review 12.03 Major Revise 12.30 Revision Submitted to Journal 01.06 With Editor 01.07 Accept 01.08
664
0
举报
[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831884, encodeId=2d9483188494, content=审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：第二次投bt 第一次5天被拒
1.22 submission
1.25 with editor
1.26 under review
2.16 under editor evaluation
2.19 major revise
两个审稿人第一个就是补实验
第二个比较苛刻提了两个尖锐的问题
主编给了1个月时间3.19
由于补实验并反复修改申延10天至3.29
3.28发着高烧坚持把修改稿返回revision submitted to journal
3.29 editor 两个小问题
3.30返修revision submitted to journal
3.31with editor 下午 accept
法国编辑nice , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e17a5413995, createdName=ms4097232105300978, createdTime=Fri Apr 01 16:11:56 CST 2016, time=2016-04-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=518185, encodeId=d58351818592, content=Submitted to Journal 11.21
With Editor 11.23
Under Review 12.03
Major Revise 12.30
Revision Submitted to Journal 01.06
With Editor 01.07
Accept 01.08, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=664, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=6f3187958, createdName=wangzch10, createdTime=Sat Jan 09 07:51:00 CST 2016, time=2016-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515637, encodeId=528751563edf, content=期刊还不错（除了自引率高一点），编辑也不错（效率很高），就是找的一些审稿人很让人无语，我的文章两个审稿人，第一个给的意见我都能接受（即使人家建议拒稿）。另一个明显是中国人审的，字里行间带着满满的讽刺和恶意，明明我写了真菌鉴定用的ITS序列分析，他非说我写的是用的16S 序列分析，回复的几条意见从没有理由，都是直接批，还用标点（叹号加问号）以示讽刺。非常不尊重我的工作。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=703, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=0a141649393, createdName=考拉苏, createdTime=Tue Sep 29 19:39:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515614, encodeId=d6f251561465, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：8.12 Submitted to Journal
8.13 With Editor
8.14 Under Review
8.22 Under Review
9.10 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Major Revise
9.27 Revision Submitted to Journal
9.28 With Editor
9.28 Accept
这是一篇关乎我博士毕业的论文，非常感谢法国编辑的效率。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=606, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=51a71653047, createdName=yulianjingsi, createdTime=Mon Sep 28 16:42:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513132, encodeId=0d2f51313239, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：红球藻代谢 5天被拒 不属于生物质能源，建议改投专门研究微藻类杂志
I regret to inform you that your submission is outside the scope of the journal because results reported would be more suited to a journal specialized in algology. Therefore I would suggest that you resubmit this paper to another journal., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=682, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=ea71103699, createdName=yiluxiaopao, createdTime=Wed Jul 01 14:33:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=512867, encodeId=64c151286ec8, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：个人感觉该杂志是比较看重新意的，并且如果paper是偏向于成果转化的话，中的可能性更大，其实感觉它对机理及深度要求不大。之前投了一篇research文章，内容数据量不是很大，但有一定的新意，所以杂志给了个short communication。审稿很快，从投出去到接受前后不到一个月时间，编辑提出的意见很中肯很专业，基本上按照他们的建议进行修改就没啥问题。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=655, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=345a1604776, createdName=zhangran22105, createdTime=Tue Jun 23 05:41:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=511593, encodeId=55835115931f, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：感谢medsci，我大部分关于sci的认识都源于此，虽然我的论文已被拒稿。以下是我的经历，供大家参考。我人论文为固定化酶用于废水处理。由于就常规材料，处理效果也一般，这个酶差不多是比较新的酶。好吧，总共只有一个审稿人的信息，各种批：材料没新意，效果让人无印象，固定方法是2传统的，操作过程不严谨，稿件主题不符合本杂志。建议投催化类的杂志，重复实验，重写文章。以下是我的经历：
3.24 submited to journal
3.26 with editor
4.02 under review
4.22 process in decission (半夜）
4.26 reject（凌晨2点）
以上纯手打，英语比较差，可能有错误！我投稿的编号是1600多，大家可以参考拒稿率。
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=1007, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=60151622867, createdName=Kaiduan1990, createdTime=Fri May 01 18:09:00 CST 2015, time=2015-05-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=508326, encodeId=c38b50832626, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：最近我刚中了一篇bt，可实验室投了好多篇接连杯具，感觉文章注重新意，另外要符合研究范围且系统。还是很容易的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=701, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=Qqs, createdTime=Wed Dec 10 16:21:00 CST 2014, time=2014-12-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507120, encodeId=8a7b50e1206c, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：拒稿率逐年升高，而且有消息称国外的期刊在遇到中国投稿的时候会限制接受率，有的甚至没审就因为名额限制而被拒掉了。一般一周左右编辑会决定直接拒稿还是送审，送审后审稿周期大于1.5~2个月，总的来说审稿速度算快了。审稿意见还是比较中肯的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=797, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=3d1494700, createdName=zhouqi269, createdTime=Tue Oct 28 09:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=505690, encodeId=d94450569089, content=我觉得这个期刊还是不错，里面有些文章质量也还是不错的，每个期刊关注的不一样，CNS里也有不好的论文存在，nature不也有作假文章吗？
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=718, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=80c7108919, createdName=lf6220, createdTime=Sat Aug 30 12:27:00 CST 2014, time=2014-08-30, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
2015-09-29
考拉苏
期刊还不错（除了自引率高一点），编辑也不错（效率很高），就是找的一些审稿人很让人无语，我的文章两个审稿人，第一个给的意见我都能接受（即使人家建议拒稿）。另一个明显是中国人审的，字里行间带着满满的讽刺和恶意，明明我写了真菌鉴定用的ITS序列分析，他非说我写的是用的16S 序列分析，回复的几条意见从没有理由，都是直接批，还用标点（叹号加问号）以示讽刺。非常不尊重我的工作。
703
0
举报
[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831884, encodeId=2d9483188494, content=审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：第二次投bt 第一次5天被拒
1.22 submission
1.25 with editor
1.26 under review
2.16 under editor evaluation
2.19 major revise
两个审稿人第一个就是补实验
第二个比较苛刻提了两个尖锐的问题
主编给了1个月时间3.19
由于补实验并反复修改申延10天至3.29
3.28发着高烧坚持把修改稿返回revision submitted to journal
3.29 editor 两个小问题
3.30返修revision submitted to journal
3.31with editor 下午 accept
法国编辑nice , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e17a5413995, createdName=ms4097232105300978, createdTime=Fri Apr 01 16:11:56 CST 2016, time=2016-04-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=518185, encodeId=d58351818592, content=Submitted to Journal 11.21
With Editor 11.23
Under Review 12.03
Major Revise 12.30
Revision Submitted to Journal 01.06
With Editor 01.07
Accept 01.08, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=664, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=6f3187958, createdName=wangzch10, createdTime=Sat Jan 09 07:51:00 CST 2016, time=2016-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515637, encodeId=528751563edf, content=期刊还不错（除了自引率高一点），编辑也不错（效率很高），就是找的一些审稿人很让人无语，我的文章两个审稿人，第一个给的意见我都能接受（即使人家建议拒稿）。另一个明显是中国人审的，字里行间带着满满的讽刺和恶意，明明我写了真菌鉴定用的ITS序列分析，他非说我写的是用的16S 序列分析，回复的几条意见从没有理由，都是直接批，还用标点（叹号加问号）以示讽刺。非常不尊重我的工作。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=703, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=0a141649393, createdName=考拉苏, createdTime=Tue Sep 29 19:39:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515614, encodeId=d6f251561465, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：8.12 Submitted to Journal
8.13 With Editor
8.14 Under Review
8.22 Under Review
9.10 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Major Revise
9.27 Revision Submitted to Journal
9.28 With Editor
9.28 Accept
这是一篇关乎我博士毕业的论文，非常感谢法国编辑的效率。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=606, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=51a71653047, createdName=yulianjingsi, createdTime=Mon Sep 28 16:42:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513132, encodeId=0d2f51313239, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：红球藻代谢 5天被拒 不属于生物质能源，建议改投专门研究微藻类杂志
I regret to inform you that your submission is outside the scope of the journal because results reported would be more suited to a journal specialized in algology. Therefore I would suggest that you resubmit this paper to another journal., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=682, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=ea71103699, createdName=yiluxiaopao, createdTime=Wed Jul 01 14:33:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=512867, encodeId=64c151286ec8, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：个人感觉该杂志是比较看重新意的，并且如果paper是偏向于成果转化的话，中的可能性更大，其实感觉它对机理及深度要求不大。之前投了一篇research文章，内容数据量不是很大，但有一定的新意，所以杂志给了个short communication。审稿很快，从投出去到接受前后不到一个月时间，编辑提出的意见很中肯很专业，基本上按照他们的建议进行修改就没啥问题。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=655, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=345a1604776, createdName=zhangran22105, createdTime=Tue Jun 23 05:41:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=511593, encodeId=55835115931f, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：感谢medsci，我大部分关于sci的认识都源于此，虽然我的论文已被拒稿。以下是我的经历，供大家参考。我人论文为固定化酶用于废水处理。由于就常规材料，处理效果也一般，这个酶差不多是比较新的酶。好吧，总共只有一个审稿人的信息，各种批：材料没新意，效果让人无印象，固定方法是2传统的，操作过程不严谨，稿件主题不符合本杂志。建议投催化类的杂志，重复实验，重写文章。以下是我的经历：
3.24 submited to journal
3.26 with editor
4.02 under review
4.22 process in decission (半夜）
4.26 reject（凌晨2点）
以上纯手打，英语比较差，可能有错误！我投稿的编号是1600多，大家可以参考拒稿率。
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=1007, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=60151622867, createdName=Kaiduan1990, createdTime=Fri May 01 18:09:00 CST 2015, time=2015-05-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=508326, encodeId=c38b50832626, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：最近我刚中了一篇bt，可实验室投了好多篇接连杯具，感觉文章注重新意，另外要符合研究范围且系统。还是很容易的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=701, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=Qqs, createdTime=Wed Dec 10 16:21:00 CST 2014, time=2014-12-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507120, encodeId=8a7b50e1206c, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：拒稿率逐年升高，而且有消息称国外的期刊在遇到中国投稿的时候会限制接受率，有的甚至没审就因为名额限制而被拒掉了。一般一周左右编辑会决定直接拒稿还是送审，送审后审稿周期大于1.5~2个月，总的来说审稿速度算快了。审稿意见还是比较中肯的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=797, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=3d1494700, createdName=zhouqi269, createdTime=Tue Oct 28 09:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=505690, encodeId=d94450569089, content=我觉得这个期刊还是不错，里面有些文章质量也还是不错的，每个期刊关注的不一样，CNS里也有不好的论文存在，nature不也有作假文章吗？
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=718, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=80c7108919, createdName=lf6220, createdTime=Sat Aug 30 12:27:00 CST 2014, time=2014-08-30, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
2015-09-28
yulianjingsi
审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0经验分享：8.12 Submitted to Journal 8.13 With Editor 8.14 Under Review 8.22 Under Review 9.10 Under Editor Evaluation 9.12 Under Editor Evaluation 9.12 Major Revise 9.27 Revision Submitted to Journal 9.28 With Editor 9.28 Accept 这是一篇关乎我博士毕业的论文，非常感谢法国编辑的效率。
606
0
举报
[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831884, encodeId=2d9483188494, content=审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：第二次投bt 第一次5天被拒
1.22 submission
1.25 with editor
1.26 under review
2.16 under editor evaluation
2.19 major revise
两个审稿人第一个就是补实验
第二个比较苛刻提了两个尖锐的问题
主编给了1个月时间3.19
由于补实验并反复修改申延10天至3.29
3.28发着高烧坚持把修改稿返回revision submitted to journal
3.29 editor 两个小问题
3.30返修revision submitted to journal
3.31with editor 下午 accept
法国编辑nice , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e17a5413995, createdName=ms4097232105300978, createdTime=Fri Apr 01 16:11:56 CST 2016, time=2016-04-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=518185, encodeId=d58351818592, content=Submitted to Journal 11.21
With Editor 11.23
Under Review 12.03
Major Revise 12.30
Revision Submitted to Journal 01.06
With Editor 01.07
Accept 01.08, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=664, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=6f3187958, createdName=wangzch10, createdTime=Sat Jan 09 07:51:00 CST 2016, time=2016-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515637, encodeId=528751563edf, content=期刊还不错（除了自引率高一点），编辑也不错（效率很高），就是找的一些审稿人很让人无语，我的文章两个审稿人，第一个给的意见我都能接受（即使人家建议拒稿）。另一个明显是中国人审的，字里行间带着满满的讽刺和恶意，明明我写了真菌鉴定用的ITS序列分析，他非说我写的是用的16S 序列分析，回复的几条意见从没有理由，都是直接批，还用标点（叹号加问号）以示讽刺。非常不尊重我的工作。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=703, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=0a141649393, createdName=考拉苏, createdTime=Tue Sep 29 19:39:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515614, encodeId=d6f251561465, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：8.12 Submitted to Journal
8.13 With Editor
8.14 Under Review
8.22 Under Review
9.10 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Major Revise
9.27 Revision Submitted to Journal
9.28 With Editor
9.28 Accept
这是一篇关乎我博士毕业的论文，非常感谢法国编辑的效率。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=606, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=51a71653047, createdName=yulianjingsi, createdTime=Mon Sep 28 16:42:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513132, encodeId=0d2f51313239, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：红球藻代谢 5天被拒 不属于生物质能源，建议改投专门研究微藻类杂志
I regret to inform you that your submission is outside the scope of the journal because results reported would be more suited to a journal specialized in algology. Therefore I would suggest that you resubmit this paper to another journal., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=682, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=ea71103699, createdName=yiluxiaopao, createdTime=Wed Jul 01 14:33:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=512867, encodeId=64c151286ec8, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：个人感觉该杂志是比较看重新意的，并且如果paper是偏向于成果转化的话，中的可能性更大，其实感觉它对机理及深度要求不大。之前投了一篇research文章，内容数据量不是很大，但有一定的新意，所以杂志给了个short communication。审稿很快，从投出去到接受前后不到一个月时间，编辑提出的意见很中肯很专业，基本上按照他们的建议进行修改就没啥问题。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=655, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=345a1604776, createdName=zhangran22105, createdTime=Tue Jun 23 05:41:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=511593, encodeId=55835115931f, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：感谢medsci，我大部分关于sci的认识都源于此，虽然我的论文已被拒稿。以下是我的经历，供大家参考。我人论文为固定化酶用于废水处理。由于就常规材料，处理效果也一般，这个酶差不多是比较新的酶。好吧，总共只有一个审稿人的信息，各种批：材料没新意，效果让人无印象，固定方法是2传统的，操作过程不严谨，稿件主题不符合本杂志。建议投催化类的杂志，重复实验，重写文章。以下是我的经历：
3.24 submited to journal
3.26 with editor
4.02 under review
4.22 process in decission (半夜）
4.26 reject（凌晨2点）
以上纯手打，英语比较差，可能有错误！我投稿的编号是1600多，大家可以参考拒稿率。
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=1007, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=60151622867, createdName=Kaiduan1990, createdTime=Fri May 01 18:09:00 CST 2015, time=2015-05-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=508326, encodeId=c38b50832626, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：最近我刚中了一篇bt，可实验室投了好多篇接连杯具，感觉文章注重新意，另外要符合研究范围且系统。还是很容易的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=701, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=Qqs, createdTime=Wed Dec 10 16:21:00 CST 2014, time=2014-12-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507120, encodeId=8a7b50e1206c, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：拒稿率逐年升高，而且有消息称国外的期刊在遇到中国投稿的时候会限制接受率，有的甚至没审就因为名额限制而被拒掉了。一般一周左右编辑会决定直接拒稿还是送审，送审后审稿周期大于1.5~2个月，总的来说审稿速度算快了。审稿意见还是比较中肯的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=797, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=3d1494700, createdName=zhouqi269, createdTime=Tue Oct 28 09:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=505690, encodeId=d94450569089, content=我觉得这个期刊还是不错，里面有些文章质量也还是不错的，每个期刊关注的不一样，CNS里也有不好的论文存在，nature不也有作假文章吗？
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=718, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=80c7108919, createdName=lf6220, createdTime=Sat Aug 30 12:27:00 CST 2014, time=2014-08-30, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
2015-07-01
yiluxiaopao
审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0经验分享：红球藻代谢 5天被拒 不属于生物质能源，建议改投专门研究微藻类杂志 I regret to inform you that your submission is outside the scope of the journal because results reported would be more suited to a journal specialized in algology. Therefore I would suggest that you resubmit this paper to another journal.
682
0
举报
[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831884, encodeId=2d9483188494, content=审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：第二次投bt 第一次5天被拒
1.22 submission
1.25 with editor
1.26 under review
2.16 under editor evaluation
2.19 major revise
两个审稿人第一个就是补实验
第二个比较苛刻提了两个尖锐的问题
主编给了1个月时间3.19
由于补实验并反复修改申延10天至3.29
3.28发着高烧坚持把修改稿返回revision submitted to journal
3.29 editor 两个小问题
3.30返修revision submitted to journal
3.31with editor 下午 accept
法国编辑nice , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e17a5413995, createdName=ms4097232105300978, createdTime=Fri Apr 01 16:11:56 CST 2016, time=2016-04-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=518185, encodeId=d58351818592, content=Submitted to Journal 11.21
With Editor 11.23
Under Review 12.03
Major Revise 12.30
Revision Submitted to Journal 01.06
With Editor 01.07
Accept 01.08, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=664, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=6f3187958, createdName=wangzch10, createdTime=Sat Jan 09 07:51:00 CST 2016, time=2016-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515637, encodeId=528751563edf, content=期刊还不错（除了自引率高一点），编辑也不错（效率很高），就是找的一些审稿人很让人无语，我的文章两个审稿人，第一个给的意见我都能接受（即使人家建议拒稿）。另一个明显是中国人审的，字里行间带着满满的讽刺和恶意，明明我写了真菌鉴定用的ITS序列分析，他非说我写的是用的16S 序列分析，回复的几条意见从没有理由，都是直接批，还用标点（叹号加问号）以示讽刺。非常不尊重我的工作。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=703, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=0a141649393, createdName=考拉苏, createdTime=Tue Sep 29 19:39:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515614, encodeId=d6f251561465, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：8.12 Submitted to Journal
8.13 With Editor
8.14 Under Review
8.22 Under Review
9.10 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Major Revise
9.27 Revision Submitted to Journal
9.28 With Editor
9.28 Accept
这是一篇关乎我博士毕业的论文，非常感谢法国编辑的效率。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=606, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=51a71653047, createdName=yulianjingsi, createdTime=Mon Sep 28 16:42:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513132, encodeId=0d2f51313239, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：红球藻代谢 5天被拒 不属于生物质能源，建议改投专门研究微藻类杂志
I regret to inform you that your submission is outside the scope of the journal because results reported would be more suited to a journal specialized in algology. Therefore I would suggest that you resubmit this paper to another journal., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=682, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=ea71103699, createdName=yiluxiaopao, createdTime=Wed Jul 01 14:33:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=512867, encodeId=64c151286ec8, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：个人感觉该杂志是比较看重新意的，并且如果paper是偏向于成果转化的话，中的可能性更大，其实感觉它对机理及深度要求不大。之前投了一篇research文章，内容数据量不是很大，但有一定的新意，所以杂志给了个short communication。审稿很快，从投出去到接受前后不到一个月时间，编辑提出的意见很中肯很专业，基本上按照他们的建议进行修改就没啥问题。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=655, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=345a1604776, createdName=zhangran22105, createdTime=Tue Jun 23 05:41:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=511593, encodeId=55835115931f, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：感谢medsci，我大部分关于sci的认识都源于此，虽然我的论文已被拒稿。以下是我的经历，供大家参考。我人论文为固定化酶用于废水处理。由于就常规材料，处理效果也一般，这个酶差不多是比较新的酶。好吧，总共只有一个审稿人的信息，各种批：材料没新意，效果让人无印象，固定方法是2传统的，操作过程不严谨，稿件主题不符合本杂志。建议投催化类的杂志，重复实验，重写文章。以下是我的经历：
3.24 submited to journal
3.26 with editor
4.02 under review
4.22 process in decission (半夜）
4.26 reject（凌晨2点）
以上纯手打，英语比较差，可能有错误！我投稿的编号是1600多，大家可以参考拒稿率。
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=1007, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=60151622867, createdName=Kaiduan1990, createdTime=Fri May 01 18:09:00 CST 2015, time=2015-05-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=508326, encodeId=c38b50832626, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：最近我刚中了一篇bt，可实验室投了好多篇接连杯具，感觉文章注重新意，另外要符合研究范围且系统。还是很容易的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=701, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=Qqs, createdTime=Wed Dec 10 16:21:00 CST 2014, time=2014-12-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507120, encodeId=8a7b50e1206c, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：拒稿率逐年升高，而且有消息称国外的期刊在遇到中国投稿的时候会限制接受率，有的甚至没审就因为名额限制而被拒掉了。一般一周左右编辑会决定直接拒稿还是送审，送审后审稿周期大于1.5~2个月，总的来说审稿速度算快了。审稿意见还是比较中肯的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=797, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=3d1494700, createdName=zhouqi269, createdTime=Tue Oct 28 09:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=505690, encodeId=d94450569089, content=我觉得这个期刊还是不错，里面有些文章质量也还是不错的，每个期刊关注的不一样，CNS里也有不好的论文存在，nature不也有作假文章吗？
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=718, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=80c7108919, createdName=lf6220, createdTime=Sat Aug 30 12:27:00 CST 2014, time=2014-08-30, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
2015-06-23
zhangran22105
审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0经验分享：个人感觉该杂志是比较看重新意的，并且如果paper是偏向于成果转化的话，中的可能性更大，其实感觉它对机理及深度要求不大。之前投了一篇research文章，内容数据量不是很大，但有一定的新意，所以杂志给了个short communication。审稿很快，从投出去到接受前后不到一个月时间，编辑提出的意见很中肯很专业，基本上按照他们的建议进行修改就没啥问题。
655
0
举报
[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831884, encodeId=2d9483188494, content=审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：第二次投bt 第一次5天被拒
1.22 submission
1.25 with editor
1.26 under review
2.16 under editor evaluation
2.19 major revise
两个审稿人第一个就是补实验
第二个比较苛刻提了两个尖锐的问题
主编给了1个月时间3.19
由于补实验并反复修改申延10天至3.29
3.28发着高烧坚持把修改稿返回revision submitted to journal
3.29 editor 两个小问题
3.30返修revision submitted to journal
3.31with editor 下午 accept
法国编辑nice , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e17a5413995, createdName=ms4097232105300978, createdTime=Fri Apr 01 16:11:56 CST 2016, time=2016-04-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=518185, encodeId=d58351818592, content=Submitted to Journal 11.21
With Editor 11.23
Under Review 12.03
Major Revise 12.30
Revision Submitted to Journal 01.06
With Editor 01.07
Accept 01.08, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=664, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=6f3187958, createdName=wangzch10, createdTime=Sat Jan 09 07:51:00 CST 2016, time=2016-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515637, encodeId=528751563edf, content=期刊还不错（除了自引率高一点），编辑也不错（效率很高），就是找的一些审稿人很让人无语，我的文章两个审稿人，第一个给的意见我都能接受（即使人家建议拒稿）。另一个明显是中国人审的，字里行间带着满满的讽刺和恶意，明明我写了真菌鉴定用的ITS序列分析，他非说我写的是用的16S 序列分析，回复的几条意见从没有理由，都是直接批，还用标点（叹号加问号）以示讽刺。非常不尊重我的工作。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=703, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=0a141649393, createdName=考拉苏, createdTime=Tue Sep 29 19:39:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515614, encodeId=d6f251561465, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：8.12 Submitted to Journal
8.13 With Editor
8.14 Under Review
8.22 Under Review
9.10 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Major Revise
9.27 Revision Submitted to Journal
9.28 With Editor
9.28 Accept
这是一篇关乎我博士毕业的论文，非常感谢法国编辑的效率。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=606, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=51a71653047, createdName=yulianjingsi, createdTime=Mon Sep 28 16:42:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513132, encodeId=0d2f51313239, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：红球藻代谢 5天被拒 不属于生物质能源，建议改投专门研究微藻类杂志
I regret to inform you that your submission is outside the scope of the journal because results reported would be more suited to a journal specialized in algology. Therefore I would suggest that you resubmit this paper to another journal., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=682, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=ea71103699, createdName=yiluxiaopao, createdTime=Wed Jul 01 14:33:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=512867, encodeId=64c151286ec8, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：个人感觉该杂志是比较看重新意的，并且如果paper是偏向于成果转化的话，中的可能性更大，其实感觉它对机理及深度要求不大。之前投了一篇research文章，内容数据量不是很大，但有一定的新意，所以杂志给了个short communication。审稿很快，从投出去到接受前后不到一个月时间，编辑提出的意见很中肯很专业，基本上按照他们的建议进行修改就没啥问题。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=655, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=345a1604776, createdName=zhangran22105, createdTime=Tue Jun 23 05:41:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=511593, encodeId=55835115931f, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：感谢medsci，我大部分关于sci的认识都源于此，虽然我的论文已被拒稿。以下是我的经历，供大家参考。我人论文为固定化酶用于废水处理。由于就常规材料，处理效果也一般，这个酶差不多是比较新的酶。好吧，总共只有一个审稿人的信息，各种批：材料没新意，效果让人无印象，固定方法是2传统的，操作过程不严谨，稿件主题不符合本杂志。建议投催化类的杂志，重复实验，重写文章。以下是我的经历：
3.24 submited to journal
3.26 with editor
4.02 under review
4.22 process in decission (半夜）
4.26 reject（凌晨2点）
以上纯手打，英语比较差，可能有错误！我投稿的编号是1600多，大家可以参考拒稿率。
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=1007, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=60151622867, createdName=Kaiduan1990, createdTime=Fri May 01 18:09:00 CST 2015, time=2015-05-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=508326, encodeId=c38b50832626, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：最近我刚中了一篇bt，可实验室投了好多篇接连杯具，感觉文章注重新意，另外要符合研究范围且系统。还是很容易的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=701, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=Qqs, createdTime=Wed Dec 10 16:21:00 CST 2014, time=2014-12-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507120, encodeId=8a7b50e1206c, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：拒稿率逐年升高，而且有消息称国外的期刊在遇到中国投稿的时候会限制接受率，有的甚至没审就因为名额限制而被拒掉了。一般一周左右编辑会决定直接拒稿还是送审，送审后审稿周期大于1.5~2个月，总的来说审稿速度算快了。审稿意见还是比较中肯的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=797, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=3d1494700, createdName=zhouqi269, createdTime=Tue Oct 28 09:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=505690, encodeId=d94450569089, content=我觉得这个期刊还是不错，里面有些文章质量也还是不错的，每个期刊关注的不一样，CNS里也有不好的论文存在，nature不也有作假文章吗？
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=718, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=80c7108919, createdName=lf6220, createdTime=Sat Aug 30 12:27:00 CST 2014, time=2014-08-30, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
2015-05-01
Kaiduan1990
审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0经验分享：感谢medsci，我大部分关于sci的认识都源于此，虽然我的论文已被拒稿。以下是我的经历，供大家参考。我人论文为固定化酶用于废水处理。由于就常规材料，处理效果也一般，这个酶差不多是比较新的酶。好吧，总共只有一个审稿人的信息，各种批：材料没新意，效果让人无印象，固定方法是2传统的，操作过程不严谨，稿件主题不符合本杂志。建议投催化类的杂志，重复实验，重写文章。以下是我的经历： 3.24 submited to journal 3.26 with editor 4.02 under review 4.22 process in decission (半夜） 4.26 reject（凌晨2点） 以上纯手打，英语比较差，可能有错误！我投稿的编号是1600多，大家可以参考拒稿率。
1007
0
举报
[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831884, encodeId=2d9483188494, content=审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：第二次投bt 第一次5天被拒
1.22 submission
1.25 with editor
1.26 under review
2.16 under editor evaluation
2.19 major revise
两个审稿人第一个就是补实验
第二个比较苛刻提了两个尖锐的问题
主编给了1个月时间3.19
由于补实验并反复修改申延10天至3.29
3.28发着高烧坚持把修改稿返回revision submitted to journal
3.29 editor 两个小问题
3.30返修revision submitted to journal
3.31with editor 下午 accept
法国编辑nice , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e17a5413995, createdName=ms4097232105300978, createdTime=Fri Apr 01 16:11:56 CST 2016, time=2016-04-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=518185, encodeId=d58351818592, content=Submitted to Journal 11.21
With Editor 11.23
Under Review 12.03
Major Revise 12.30
Revision Submitted to Journal 01.06
With Editor 01.07
Accept 01.08, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=664, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=6f3187958, createdName=wangzch10, createdTime=Sat Jan 09 07:51:00 CST 2016, time=2016-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515637, encodeId=528751563edf, content=期刊还不错（除了自引率高一点），编辑也不错（效率很高），就是找的一些审稿人很让人无语，我的文章两个审稿人，第一个给的意见我都能接受（即使人家建议拒稿）。另一个明显是中国人审的，字里行间带着满满的讽刺和恶意，明明我写了真菌鉴定用的ITS序列分析，他非说我写的是用的16S 序列分析，回复的几条意见从没有理由，都是直接批，还用标点（叹号加问号）以示讽刺。非常不尊重我的工作。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=703, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=0a141649393, createdName=考拉苏, createdTime=Tue Sep 29 19:39:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515614, encodeId=d6f251561465, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：8.12 Submitted to Journal
8.13 With Editor
8.14 Under Review
8.22 Under Review
9.10 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Major Revise
9.27 Revision Submitted to Journal
9.28 With Editor
9.28 Accept
这是一篇关乎我博士毕业的论文，非常感谢法国编辑的效率。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=606, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=51a71653047, createdName=yulianjingsi, createdTime=Mon Sep 28 16:42:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513132, encodeId=0d2f51313239, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：红球藻代谢 5天被拒 不属于生物质能源，建议改投专门研究微藻类杂志
I regret to inform you that your submission is outside the scope of the journal because results reported would be more suited to a journal specialized in algology. Therefore I would suggest that you resubmit this paper to another journal., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=682, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=ea71103699, createdName=yiluxiaopao, createdTime=Wed Jul 01 14:33:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=512867, encodeId=64c151286ec8, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：个人感觉该杂志是比较看重新意的，并且如果paper是偏向于成果转化的话，中的可能性更大，其实感觉它对机理及深度要求不大。之前投了一篇research文章，内容数据量不是很大，但有一定的新意，所以杂志给了个short communication。审稿很快，从投出去到接受前后不到一个月时间，编辑提出的意见很中肯很专业，基本上按照他们的建议进行修改就没啥问题。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=655, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=345a1604776, createdName=zhangran22105, createdTime=Tue Jun 23 05:41:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=511593, encodeId=55835115931f, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：感谢medsci，我大部分关于sci的认识都源于此，虽然我的论文已被拒稿。以下是我的经历，供大家参考。我人论文为固定化酶用于废水处理。由于就常规材料，处理效果也一般，这个酶差不多是比较新的酶。好吧，总共只有一个审稿人的信息，各种批：材料没新意，效果让人无印象，固定方法是2传统的，操作过程不严谨，稿件主题不符合本杂志。建议投催化类的杂志，重复实验，重写文章。以下是我的经历：
3.24 submited to journal
3.26 with editor
4.02 under review
4.22 process in decission (半夜）
4.26 reject（凌晨2点）
以上纯手打，英语比较差，可能有错误！我投稿的编号是1600多，大家可以参考拒稿率。
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=1007, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=60151622867, createdName=Kaiduan1990, createdTime=Fri May 01 18:09:00 CST 2015, time=2015-05-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=508326, encodeId=c38b50832626, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：最近我刚中了一篇bt，可实验室投了好多篇接连杯具，感觉文章注重新意，另外要符合研究范围且系统。还是很容易的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=701, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=Qqs, createdTime=Wed Dec 10 16:21:00 CST 2014, time=2014-12-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507120, encodeId=8a7b50e1206c, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：拒稿率逐年升高，而且有消息称国外的期刊在遇到中国投稿的时候会限制接受率，有的甚至没审就因为名额限制而被拒掉了。一般一周左右编辑会决定直接拒稿还是送审，送审后审稿周期大于1.5~2个月，总的来说审稿速度算快了。审稿意见还是比较中肯的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=797, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=3d1494700, createdName=zhouqi269, createdTime=Tue Oct 28 09:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=505690, encodeId=d94450569089, content=我觉得这个期刊还是不错，里面有些文章质量也还是不错的，每个期刊关注的不一样，CNS里也有不好的论文存在，nature不也有作假文章吗？
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=718, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=80c7108919, createdName=lf6220, createdTime=Sat Aug 30 12:27:00 CST 2014, time=2014-08-30, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
2014-12-10
Qqs
审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0经验分享：最近我刚中了一篇bt，可实验室投了好多篇接连杯具，感觉文章注重新意，另外要符合研究范围且系统。还是很容易的。
701
0
举报
[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831884, encodeId=2d9483188494, content=审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：第二次投bt 第一次5天被拒
1.22 submission
1.25 with editor
1.26 under review
2.16 under editor evaluation
2.19 major revise
两个审稿人第一个就是补实验
第二个比较苛刻提了两个尖锐的问题
主编给了1个月时间3.19
由于补实验并反复修改申延10天至3.29
3.28发着高烧坚持把修改稿返回revision submitted to journal
3.29 editor 两个小问题
3.30返修revision submitted to journal
3.31with editor 下午 accept
法国编辑nice , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e17a5413995, createdName=ms4097232105300978, createdTime=Fri Apr 01 16:11:56 CST 2016, time=2016-04-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=518185, encodeId=d58351818592, content=Submitted to Journal 11.21
With Editor 11.23
Under Review 12.03
Major Revise 12.30
Revision Submitted to Journal 01.06
With Editor 01.07
Accept 01.08, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=664, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=6f3187958, createdName=wangzch10, createdTime=Sat Jan 09 07:51:00 CST 2016, time=2016-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515637, encodeId=528751563edf, content=期刊还不错（除了自引率高一点），编辑也不错（效率很高），就是找的一些审稿人很让人无语，我的文章两个审稿人，第一个给的意见我都能接受（即使人家建议拒稿）。另一个明显是中国人审的，字里行间带着满满的讽刺和恶意，明明我写了真菌鉴定用的ITS序列分析，他非说我写的是用的16S 序列分析，回复的几条意见从没有理由，都是直接批，还用标点（叹号加问号）以示讽刺。非常不尊重我的工作。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=703, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=0a141649393, createdName=考拉苏, createdTime=Tue Sep 29 19:39:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515614, encodeId=d6f251561465, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：8.12 Submitted to Journal
8.13 With Editor
8.14 Under Review
8.22 Under Review
9.10 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Major Revise
9.27 Revision Submitted to Journal
9.28 With Editor
9.28 Accept
这是一篇关乎我博士毕业的论文，非常感谢法国编辑的效率。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=606, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=51a71653047, createdName=yulianjingsi, createdTime=Mon Sep 28 16:42:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513132, encodeId=0d2f51313239, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：红球藻代谢 5天被拒 不属于生物质能源，建议改投专门研究微藻类杂志
I regret to inform you that your submission is outside the scope of the journal because results reported would be more suited to a journal specialized in algology. Therefore I would suggest that you resubmit this paper to another journal., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=682, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=ea71103699, createdName=yiluxiaopao, createdTime=Wed Jul 01 14:33:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=512867, encodeId=64c151286ec8, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：个人感觉该杂志是比较看重新意的，并且如果paper是偏向于成果转化的话，中的可能性更大，其实感觉它对机理及深度要求不大。之前投了一篇research文章，内容数据量不是很大，但有一定的新意，所以杂志给了个short communication。审稿很快，从投出去到接受前后不到一个月时间，编辑提出的意见很中肯很专业，基本上按照他们的建议进行修改就没啥问题。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=655, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=345a1604776, createdName=zhangran22105, createdTime=Tue Jun 23 05:41:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=511593, encodeId=55835115931f, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：感谢medsci，我大部分关于sci的认识都源于此，虽然我的论文已被拒稿。以下是我的经历，供大家参考。我人论文为固定化酶用于废水处理。由于就常规材料，处理效果也一般，这个酶差不多是比较新的酶。好吧，总共只有一个审稿人的信息，各种批：材料没新意，效果让人无印象，固定方法是2传统的，操作过程不严谨，稿件主题不符合本杂志。建议投催化类的杂志，重复实验，重写文章。以下是我的经历：
3.24 submited to journal
3.26 with editor
4.02 under review
4.22 process in decission (半夜）
4.26 reject（凌晨2点）
以上纯手打，英语比较差，可能有错误！我投稿的编号是1600多，大家可以参考拒稿率。
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=1007, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=60151622867, createdName=Kaiduan1990, createdTime=Fri May 01 18:09:00 CST 2015, time=2015-05-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=508326, encodeId=c38b50832626, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：最近我刚中了一篇bt，可实验室投了好多篇接连杯具，感觉文章注重新意，另外要符合研究范围且系统。还是很容易的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=701, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=Qqs, createdTime=Wed Dec 10 16:21:00 CST 2014, time=2014-12-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507120, encodeId=8a7b50e1206c, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：拒稿率逐年升高，而且有消息称国外的期刊在遇到中国投稿的时候会限制接受率，有的甚至没审就因为名额限制而被拒掉了。一般一周左右编辑会决定直接拒稿还是送审，送审后审稿周期大于1.5~2个月，总的来说审稿速度算快了。审稿意见还是比较中肯的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=797, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=3d1494700, createdName=zhouqi269, createdTime=Tue Oct 28 09:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=505690, encodeId=d94450569089, content=我觉得这个期刊还是不错，里面有些文章质量也还是不错的，每个期刊关注的不一样，CNS里也有不好的论文存在，nature不也有作假文章吗？
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=718, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=80c7108919, createdName=lf6220, createdTime=Sat Aug 30 12:27:00 CST 2014, time=2014-08-30, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
2014-10-28
zhouqi269
审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0经验分享：拒稿率逐年升高，而且有消息称国外的期刊在遇到中国投稿的时候会限制接受率，有的甚至没审就因为名额限制而被拒掉了。一般一周左右编辑会决定直接拒稿还是送审，送审后审稿周期大于1.5~2个月，总的来说审稿速度算快了。审稿意见还是比较中肯的。
797
0
举报
[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831884, encodeId=2d9483188494, content=审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：第二次投bt 第一次5天被拒
1.22 submission
1.25 with editor
1.26 under review
2.16 under editor evaluation
2.19 major revise
两个审稿人第一个就是补实验
第二个比较苛刻提了两个尖锐的问题
主编给了1个月时间3.19
由于补实验并反复修改申延10天至3.29
3.28发着高烧坚持把修改稿返回revision submitted to journal
3.29 editor 两个小问题
3.30返修revision submitted to journal
3.31with editor 下午 accept
法国编辑nice , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e17a5413995, createdName=ms4097232105300978, createdTime=Fri Apr 01 16:11:56 CST 2016, time=2016-04-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=518185, encodeId=d58351818592, content=Submitted to Journal 11.21
With Editor 11.23
Under Review 12.03
Major Revise 12.30
Revision Submitted to Journal 01.06
With Editor 01.07
Accept 01.08, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=664, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=6f3187958, createdName=wangzch10, createdTime=Sat Jan 09 07:51:00 CST 2016, time=2016-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515637, encodeId=528751563edf, content=期刊还不错（除了自引率高一点），编辑也不错（效率很高），就是找的一些审稿人很让人无语，我的文章两个审稿人，第一个给的意见我都能接受（即使人家建议拒稿）。另一个明显是中国人审的，字里行间带着满满的讽刺和恶意，明明我写了真菌鉴定用的ITS序列分析，他非说我写的是用的16S 序列分析，回复的几条意见从没有理由，都是直接批，还用标点（叹号加问号）以示讽刺。非常不尊重我的工作。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=703, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=0a141649393, createdName=考拉苏, createdTime=Tue Sep 29 19:39:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=515614, encodeId=d6f251561465, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：8.12 Submitted to Journal
8.13 With Editor
8.14 Under Review
8.22 Under Review
9.10 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Under Editor Evaluation
9.12 Major Revise
9.27 Revision Submitted to Journal
9.28 With Editor
9.28 Accept
这是一篇关乎我博士毕业的论文，非常感谢法国编辑的效率。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=606, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=51a71653047, createdName=yulianjingsi, createdTime=Mon Sep 28 16:42:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513132, encodeId=0d2f51313239, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：红球藻代谢 5天被拒 不属于生物质能源，建议改投专门研究微藻类杂志
I regret to inform you that your submission is outside the scope of the journal because results reported would be more suited to a journal specialized in algology. Therefore I would suggest that you resubmit this paper to another journal., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=682, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=ea71103699, createdName=yiluxiaopao, createdTime=Wed Jul 01 14:33:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=512867, encodeId=64c151286ec8, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：个人感觉该杂志是比较看重新意的，并且如果paper是偏向于成果转化的话，中的可能性更大，其实感觉它对机理及深度要求不大。之前投了一篇research文章，内容数据量不是很大，但有一定的新意，所以杂志给了个short communication。审稿很快，从投出去到接受前后不到一个月时间，编辑提出的意见很中肯很专业，基本上按照他们的建议进行修改就没啥问题。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=655, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=345a1604776, createdName=zhangran22105, createdTime=Tue Jun 23 05:41:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=511593, encodeId=55835115931f, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：感谢medsci，我大部分关于sci的认识都源于此，虽然我的论文已被拒稿。以下是我的经历，供大家参考。我人论文为固定化酶用于废水处理。由于就常规材料，处理效果也一般，这个酶差不多是比较新的酶。好吧，总共只有一个审稿人的信息，各种批：材料没新意，效果让人无印象，固定方法是2传统的，操作过程不严谨，稿件主题不符合本杂志。建议投催化类的杂志，重复实验，重写文章。以下是我的经历：
3.24 submited to journal
3.26 with editor
4.02 under review
4.22 process in decission (半夜）
4.26 reject（凌晨2点）
以上纯手打，英语比较差，可能有错误！我投稿的编号是1600多，大家可以参考拒稿率。
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=1007, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=60151622867, createdName=Kaiduan1990, createdTime=Fri May 01 18:09:00 CST 2015, time=2015-05-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=508326, encodeId=c38b50832626, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：最近我刚中了一篇bt，可实验室投了好多篇接连杯具，感觉文章注重新意，另外要符合研究范围且系统。还是很容易的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=701, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=Qqs, createdTime=Wed Dec 10 16:21:00 CST 2014, time=2014-12-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507120, encodeId=8a7b50e1206c, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：拒稿率逐年升高，而且有消息称国外的期刊在遇到中国投稿的时候会限制接受率，有的甚至没审就因为名额限制而被拒掉了。一般一周左右编辑会决定直接拒稿还是送审，送审后审稿周期大于1.5~2个月，总的来说审稿速度算快了。审稿意见还是比较中肯的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=797, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=3d1494700, createdName=zhouqi269, createdTime=Tue Oct 28 09:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=505690, encodeId=d94450569089, content=我觉得这个期刊还是不错，里面有些文章质量也还是不错的，每个期刊关注的不一样，CNS里也有不好的论文存在，nature不也有作假文章吗？
, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=718, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=80c7108919, createdName=lf6220, createdTime=Sat Aug 30 12:27:00 CST 2014, time=2014-08-30, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
2014-08-30
lf6220
我觉得这个期刊还是不错，里面有些文章质量也还是不错的，每个期刊关注的不一样，CNS里也有不好的论文存在，nature不也有作假文章吗？
718
0
举报